17/11/2012

Chronicles of Desire & Obsession (by Sanita Fejzic)

Mathieu Laca’s Scenes, Portraits of Self and Others


 White Triptych (right canvas), 2012


Mathieu Laca’s art confronts, shocks, demands, provokes. It is elegant and bare in its frankness and effect. And is immediately felt. Stimulated by complex layers, symbols and strokes, the viewer’s sense are triggered and stirred: a deep psychological penetration, an uncomfortable examination, a tender and brutal duel between artist and his desires and obsessions.

I stand still as my conscious and unconscious mind seeps in his body of work. I face my inner censor, moving my eyes from one point of focus to the next. What is art if not the inner movement that reveals our own shadows, desires and breaking points?

Strong in homoerotic and symbolic content, his work echoes the reality of how I experience life through the mind: a jungle, beautiful and wild, scary and scattered, surreal and full of recurring patterns I try to decipher and often fail to grasp—the more basic, banal and truly bestial nature of myself, an animal; myself an intellectual hungry for meaning; myself emotional, reacting with disgust, fear and sometimes, very rarely, with abandon and laughter.

Few artists are able to bring out my competing and complementary selves to the surface. The visual impact of Laca’s work bridges the gap between my angels and demons. My own desires and obsessions.

Symbols can be collective or personal: like the sunflower that flirts effortlessly with beauty and summer in Vincent Van Gogh II, or the deformed creature whose jaw has no face or eyes in Triptyque blanc (right canvas). Traditionally, art carries with it the essence of beauty. But that is only one effect on a spectrum of endless possibilities. Something strange and disturbing lurks below the surface of Laca’s work. A dark force, potent and violent that persists and insists. That leaves no easy interpretation. That draws me closer to myself.


Vincent Van Gogh II, 2012


First desire. Then obsession. What is the link? Desire burns inside the body, mind and soul. In his
series “Self-portraits on raw linen,” the subject’s body is contorted. Masculine flesh exposes the
contours of muscles and bones. In Alter Ego and Leitmotiv the figure sits in the same position: arms wrapped around leg, hiding the sexual organ. In the first painting, Laca is concerned with the effect of psychology on the body; the man leaps forward, stands up or holds back. Each one of these movements and their fluidity is an expression of desire. By nature, desire wants, reaches and holds back. This activity gives birth to tension and more desire.

In both portraits, a dash of red paint punctures the canvas, the colour of passion and symbol of blood. In Leitmotiv an antique saw is attached to the canvas. It’s powerful object with double-entendre. Hovering over the head, it represents strength and the back and forth pull of obsession. What is it that cuts the artist? Obsession with art (its tradition, movement and rupture), raw flesh, emotion, sex and the deep penetration of desire? Obsession with form and the male body? The intensity of it all.


 Leitmotiv, 2008


In both of these portraits, a yellow disk and an eclipsed sun hang on the upper left corner of the
canvas. In Horizon, Laca glued a rusted metal cover; in Avoidance, a sophisticated rose window bursts with abstract design. They echo the cyclical nature of desire and obsession. Obsession is an act of repetition, and desire craves more, always more. The combined intensity of these two forces prove ecstatic, as is the case in Reclining Nude. Notice no circle, no red in this portrait. A moment of surrender, the white of ejaculation. The face is tranquil, eyes are closed and hands are held under the back—the fullness and calm after the release of passion. The French title Gisant stands for a funeral sculpture found in Middle-Age French tombs, providing a window into the ambivalent relationship between desire and death.

Perhaps Laca’s most powerful representations of passion can be found in his series “Scenes.” His
painting White Triptych eludes me. My reaction is guttural; I am left with an uncomfortable feeling. The recurring symbol of the circle is here, this time it’s vivid red. Passion and blood, I feel it even if contextualizing it is difficult. Why the decapitation of woman and creature in the centre and right paintings? My mind wants an easy answer to make the discomfort disappear.

The artist has managed to tell me something about myself, whether by accident or with intent: I still haven’t learnt to sit still with discomfort. A personal truth, a deeply rooted protective instinct. I want to escape it, analyze and control it. Facing it is something else entirely.

Where did I learn to avoid discomfort? The cross above the bird with a human head, eyes Xed out.
Religion has taught me to be good, to walk away from the gruesome, the bloody and whatever else is deemed grotesque. I don’t need religion to know the distinction between ‘good’ and ‘bad.’ Society may have loosened up over time, but these notions are unconsciously preserved.

In Printemps québécois, Laca confronts current social issues, the student riots in Quebec. The red
square is a symbol with new meaning: access to affordable education. The policeman wears a mask, he has no identity, he is the hand of societal control, hitting and kicking. Is collective freedom necessarily gained through force? So long as the individual wears the mask of authority, he has the power to kick and hurt without truly looking at himself in the mirror.

And if we look in the mirror, what do we see?

In Rebirth, a baby’s head escapes from a man’s neck. It comes out of a fire of yellow and orange.
Blood drips. When we face the mirror and look at what is—reflection of desires, obsessions, beautiful and grotesque, unique and collective—are we born anew or are we simply raising our level of consciousness? Do we go back to a screaming infant, or do we see the many layers of our self?

A deeper understanding of these layers in his large painting, Mort ou vif (Dead or alive). Set in a
natural landscape, with a rocky mountain and green grass: battles between two horses and two men. Below the action, a newborn. This is an epic scene. Horses are prays, they are domesticated animals. Rarely do we see horses fight to blood, and yet this is exactly the frame of mind Laca puts us in. A layer below, two men, naked are also fighting. Neither penises are erect; there is no suggestion that the struggle is homoerotic and yet, the tone is clear. The opponents’ hands are on one another’s hip and shoulder. They are not violent, just firm.



Mort ou vif, 2012


The translucence effect merges the horses to the men. The baby’s body alone is painted in solid
colours. The same colours as in Rebirth. A dark green cord grounds the baby to earth, perhaps the
umbilical cord? Laca has said that he doesn’t see his work as violent, preferring instead the word
passion. One can deduce that, as in the relationship between desire and obsession, violence and
passion complement each other.

Passion is the intense heat of life. But the flame of violence destroys life. We see it in the
painting: it begins with the innocent cry of a baby; then the passionate wrestle between men; it
ends with a brutal bite to the jaw. If we look at Mort ou vif from point of view that life begins
innocently and grows passionately, then it seems only natural to conclude that violence ends in
death. The relationship between passion and violence is not cyclical, it is linear. Where violence
begins, passion ends.

A visceral reaction—almost instant, barely noticed—to Self-portrait on Green Ground. Thin and
thick brush strokes compose the colour of bare flesh. An intense concentration of texture and
deep strokes puncture at the mouth: black, stretched, screaming. Whose hands pull at the
artist, tearing him open?

The background is muted and ghostly, with the typical paint drippings and point of view found in
Laca’s portraiture. The atmosphere is serene in its choice of colours, with vivid and soft pastels
and yet, it’s full of intensity. Head slightly tilted, mouth torn open by the pull of hands: I realize I
am facing an orgasm. The fingers hold a gentle grip, they do not tear the skin. The mouth
opens wide and with surrender. I almost blush when I see the ecstasy in his face; I have
intruded intimacy. It makes me wonder if desire is bit into like an apple or if instead, pleasure
opens the mouth wide, pulling out a breath of surrender from deep within. The eyes will not tell,
they are closed.

Self-portrait on Green Ground is similar in style to Laca’s “Old Masters” series. In 2011, Laca
began his first series of portraits of iconic artists, ranging from Dali to Riopelle.

Laca researched the original pigments used by the cannons in their own work as a means to
get closer to the language of painting, to its source and history. He researched the original
colours used by the masters, including minerals like vermilion, lapis lazuli, orpiment, malachite,
madder lake, lead white pigment and Nicosia green earth. It’s this quality that gives each
portrait their authentic essence.

The result is formal and seeped in classical tradition, as is apparent by the style. What gives
the portraits their distinctive flair is the vivid strokes and drippings that connect them to their
contemporary context. In Jean-Auguste-Dominique Ingres, Laca reinterpreted the artist’s Selfportrait at age 24 (1804), staying loyal to the tone and intensity of the dark colours the French neoclassical painter is notorious for. The departure from the classical interpretation of the portraits is clear in the red and dark spatula effect on the right hand corner.

My eyes shift from Ingres’s large green eyes to the red paint and golden flower of the frame.
The effect is in the contrast between old and new. Left, right, left, right from tradition to
something completely unexpected.


Jean-Auguste-Dominique Ingres, 2012


In addition to the drippings and splashes of bright colour, the frame itself builds on the theme of old and new. Each frame is carefully composed, as in Gustav Klimt’s masterpieces whose golden
frames cannot be separated from the paintings they hug. Laca’s husband, Jean Comeau carves
wood and gilds his flowers and other motifs with gold leaves. Always conscious of structural
impact, Comeau ensures that his additions never touch the canvas or place any unnecessary
pressure on the frame. When he fixes his sculptures on the modern shadow-box frames, he
finalizes the work. Each piece adds meaning as, for example, in the portrait of Bosch, for which he
sculpted a small dragon in reference to the many creatures painted by the artist.

The connection between artist and artisan, husband and husband is profound. In his portrait Jean (77 cm x 61 cm), Laca’s brush strokes are balanced and beautiful. The focus is the eyes. When the spin of desire, obsession, passion, nakedness and rawness come to a halt, there is the stillness of love. Perhaps that’s what those blue eyes inspire in me. The vastness and endlessness of love.


Jean, 2012



Excerpt form the exhibition catalog Mort ou vif » 

Sanita Fejzic is a fiction writer based in Ottawa. She has published her poetry and short stories in various literary magazines including Guerilla, Byword and The Newer York. In the past year, she was the author of The Beaver Tales blog for Xtra newspaper as well as the Ottawa correspondent for 2B, Être and Entre Elles magazines. Prior to her independent writing career, Fejzic was also the Editor-in-chief of Muse magazine for the Canadian Museums Association as well as the English editor at the Canadian Museum of Civilization and the Canadian War Museum.

15/11/2012

Le regard, le temps et la décadence (par Normand Babin)



Francis Bacon, 2012, collection privée 

Le regard

Lorsque le regard vous a capté, vous venez de comprendre que vous ne serez plus maître de rien. Les personnages chez Laca ont un regard qui vous happe, vous rend captifs. Ces portraits de mentors sont tous un peu des autoportraits. Les multiples Laca sont là devant vous, à quémander leur existence dans votre vie. Laca lui-même s’est posé sur leurs épaules, et attend patiemment que vous succombiez à leur (son) charme. Le regard que vous porterez sur leur regard sera celui que l’artiste aura choisi de recevoir. Laca dirige de main de maître ces maîtres, anciens ou non, en vous les faisant voir avec ses yeux, et vous voyant par leurs yeux. Par son regard, il impose le regard du sujet, force le regard du regardant. Les yeux sont presque toujours les mêmes, leur expression uniforme. Tristesse ? Lassitude ? Amertume ? Oui et non. Les yeux des protagonistes des toiles de Laca ont la lourdeur d’un passé, la vision de la brièveté de l’avenir, la sourde sauvagerie latente. Ces yeux disent qui il est. Jeune et vieux à la fois, l’artiste ne se pâmera plus souvent, il préférera sourire aux anges. L’artiste ne voit plus que ce qui a été, mais surtout ce qui inévitablement sera. Sans l'ombre d’une nostalgie. L’homme est l’homme.



El Greco, 2011

Le temps

A-chronologique, les portraits se côtoient dans une foire intemporelle. Seuls le grand Œuvre et l’héritage donné à Laca discutent entre eux. Mais le symposium réunit l’humain qui a toujours été humain et l’humain-artiste, qui lui a toujours su sublimer son présent pour en faire un infini. Le fil historique de l’art est un cercle où tout s’arrime à tous les temps. Un cercle où chacun se fera face, où chacun pourra glisser d’une place à l’autre. L’histoire vue comme une ritournelle, l’histoire qui tourne en rond, non pas parce qu’elle ne crée pas, mais plutôt parce qu’elle crée continuellement, toujours pour les mêmes raisons, pour qui ou par qui que ce soit. Mathieu Laca a saisi l’impossible temporalité de l’oeuvre d’art véritable, l’impossible saison de l’artiste véritable.

Pérennité et éternité se confondent forcément. L’origine se tire du futur autant que d’hier. L’artiste véritable contemple de haut le roulement des siècles, sans participer à sa précipitation vers l’abîme. Il constate et pose un diagnostic ambivalent sur une évolution qui n’en est peut-être pas.



Jean, 2012

La décadence

Car tout fini par pourrir. Le corps, l’âme, les idées, les intentions et les valeurs. Autant en fixer les contours. L’homme devient bête, féroce ou sexuelle, le corps grouille de vermine, éclate de pus, le corps rejette sa condition humaine, se rend semblable à l’inhumain rapace. Le corps dévore à défaut de se faire dévorer. Le corps dévolue dans une orgie de coulis dégueulasses, dans une fête du macabre. Le corps se liquéfie, devient sang, devient fleuve.
Chez Mathieu Laca, il y aura toujours cette valse entre sublime et trivial, entre admiration et dégoût, entre larmes et crachats. Les dieux ne sont pas si dieux que ça : ils sont hommes. L’homme Laca nous rappelle qu’il ne faut pas rêver. S’il est toujours possible de voir le Beau, le fond est toujours moite et visqueux. L’homme peut toujours reprendre le dessus sur l’artiste. La bête peut toujours surgir des entrailles de l’homme. Et ce n’est pas pour autant qu’on sera triste et mauvais. La joie est dans le gras, le gargantuesque. Le plaisir est de se vautrer dans le stupre, de déraper dans les glaires, de glisser dans les marécages de l’âme si peu humaine.

Le regard chez Laca a vu que l’art chez Laca a vécu, vit et vivra dans une spirale souriante.

Le regard de Laca voit le corps qui a vécu, vit et vivra dans une déperdition joyeuse.



Normand Babin

Pianiste classique de formation, Normand Babin s’implique activement à la reconnaissance des designers et des artistes émergents. Depuis près de trois ans, il tient un blog, montrealistement.blogspot.com, où il relate les événements qui lui plaisent dans les arts visuels, en architecture, en design et en musique contemporaine. Il est commissaire aux expositions à la galerie Modulum depuis le printemps 2012.

22/08/2012

Mort ou vif - Site internet de l'expo / Website of the exhibition


Pour toutes les informations concernant ma prochaine expo solo à Montréal, consultez le site suivant en cliquant ici »

For all the information on my upcoming solo show in Montreal, click on the following link »

20/07/2012

Van Gogh de près

 
 Vincent Van Gogh, Vue des Saintes-Maries, 1888


Hier, je suis allé voir l'exposition Van Gogh au Musée des Beaux-Arts du Canada à Ottawa. L'exposition ne m'a pas vraiment renversé. Il s'agit pour l'essentiel de plantes et de paysages (une quarantaine d'oeuvres) dont beaucoup ne sont pas plus poussés que des études peintes. Heureusement, quelques exceptions formidables se détachent du lot. Les Cantonniers du boulevard Victor Hugo que j'avais déjà eu la chance d'apprécier à Montréal, un Pré fleuri de Saint-Rémy. Ou cette magnifique Vue des Saintes-Maries dans laquelle les sillons d'un champ de lavande guident l'oeil vers un amoncellement de toits ocres écrasés par le turquoise clair d'un ciel de Provence. Et enfin, dans la dernière salle, une toile minuscule vous éclate au coin de l'oeil. Acacia en fleur, malgré sa modeste dimension, contient en puissance toute l'exaltation anticipée de l'expressionnisme abstrait.

Malgré cela, légère déception, celle de ne pas voir enfin ces paysages où les nuages et les cyprès sont comme aspirés en volutes mirobolants par le ciel. Et le fameux Amandier en fleur aussi, même si on y sent toute la légèreté des anciens Japonais. Bien que placé en vedette, il m'est apparu comme trop ostensiblement décoratif par son utilisation du «all over».

N'empêche, les deux heures de route valaient bien une seule toile, magnifique et mystérieuse: Sous-bois avec couple. Un format horizontal ponctué de troncs d'arbre violets qui jalonnent en rangs un espace d'herbe d'un jaune et vert éclatant. Au loin, la sombre lisière d'un bois bleu de Prusse nous donne un léger frisson. Soudain, on aperçoit, au centre, planté comme un bout d'écorce, un couple qui se tient droit dans le tumulte végétal. On dirait des fantômes. Ceux d'ancêtres vêtus en jeunes mariés et revenus pour nous dire quelque chose. Leurs corps semblent se dissoudre dans la touffeur trop verte et la lumière trop intense. Sublime.



 Vincent Van Gogn, Sous-bois avec couple, 1890




Voici deux portraits de Van Gogh que j'ai peints dans la dernière année. Le deuxième d'après un autoportrait de 1888.



Vincent Van Gogh I, huile sur lin/oil on linen, 77cmX62cm, 2011

 


 

 Vincent Van Gogh II, huile sur lin, encadrement à gorge en chêne
avec applique sculptée dorée à la feuille, 86cmX72cm, 2012

11/07/2012

Peinture cochonne

Peinture cochonne, huile sur lin/oil on linen, 153cmX122cm, 2012

15/06/2012

Tea Party


The Tea Party, huile sur lin / oil on linen, 183cmX123cm, 2011

10/06/2012

Bosch

Mathieu Laca, Hieronymus Bosch, oil and traditional pigments on linen /
huile et pigments traditionnels sur lin, encadrement à gorge en chêne avec applique sculptée dorée à la feuille d'argent / oak shadow box with carved onlay gilded with silver leaf, 92cm X 73cm, 2012



I could not depict Bosch with a suit and a tie, or the equivalent in his time, right? So I painted him with a funnel on his head, as if he had escaped from the Ship of Fools, a glimmer of madness in his eye. It still amazes me how this painter, so long ago, had the guts to paint such delirious fantasies aside which even our recent Surrealists look tame!

Je ne pouvais pas dépeindre Bosch en complet-cravate, ou l’équivalent à son époque, n’est-ce pas? Alors je l’ai peint avec un entonnoir sur la tête, comme s’il venait de s’échapper de la Nef des fous, une lueur de folie dans les yeux. Ça me fascine toujours comment ce peintre, il y a si longtemps, a pu avoir le cran de peindre de si rocambolesques fantaisies à côté desquelles même nos récents surréalistes ont l’air apprivoisés!


***

My portrait was painted using only pigments that were available to Bosch in his time. Below is how a few of those pigments are distributed in my work. Click here to read more on my research about traditional pigments.

Mon portrait a été peint en utilisant seulement des pigments qui étaient disponibles pour Bosch à son époque. Ci-dessous, vous trouverez la répartition de quelques-uns de ces pigments. Cliquez ici pour plus de détails sur ma recherche à propos des pigments traditionnels (texte en anglais).



***

Below is a detail of the frame. Just as the painting, the framing also refers to tradition. It quotes traditional woodcarving patterns with a silver leaf onlay at the bottom right corner of the otherwise very modern oak shadow box.

Ci-dessous, un détail du cadre. Comme la peinture, l'encadrement fait écho à la tradition. Il cite des motifs traditionnels de la sculpture décorative par l'ajout d'une applique dorée à la feuille d'argent dans le coin inférieur droit du pourtant très moderne encadrement à gorge en chêne.






Hieronymus Bosch, The Ship of Fools / La Nef des Fous, 1500



Hieronymus Bosch, The Temptation of St. Anthony (detail below) /
La Tentation de Saint Antoine
(detail ci-dessous), 1500




Interview With Mathieu Laca on Italian blog http://foggygrizzly.blogspot.com/




q) Please introduce yourself.

a) Hello, my name is Mathieu Laca and I’m a painter.

q) Where do you live and work?
a) I live and work in Laval, a suburb of Montreal, the largest city in Québec which is the French-speaking province of Canada.
q) How would you describe your work to someone who has never seen it?
a) First, I would say that my work is figurative but also daring, provocative, challenging. I would say that it’s not decorative.
q) How did you start in the arts? How/when did you realize you were an artist?
a) In 1999, when I was 17, I remember as well as if it was yesterday of one of the very large ink and graphite drawings I did for a special project. As I was sketching out a torso with curved lines, something happened. I had a strong and marvelous feeling. The muscles instinctively took shape under my fingers. It was as if my hand was guided. This imploring figure that I drew, emerging from a black sea, its ribcage offered in sacrifice, its weeping phallic shark-like head… it was me! That was what I was living at that precise moment and that no words could ever describe. I was trying to emerge from darkness. The excitement of that revelation and the sense of completion were almost unbearable. At that moment, I knew that I would dedicate my life to painting.
q) What are your favorite art materials and why?
a) Oil paint. Why? It was invented to represent human flesh and that’s what interests me.
q) What/who influences you most?
a) As you learn, you go through phases during which you’re inspired by different artists. I went through a lot of phases. Consequently, I was inspired by a lot of artists. But, when I found a style that suited me, that was my own and that really came from within, I stopped searching for “a way” to paint. I have to say though that the artist that fascinated me most and that continues to do so is Francis Bacon. His obsession for the human figure, his incredible confidence in painterly “mistakes”, the way he literally has put his guts onto canvas… His color combinations, the way he distorted bodies according to his feeling, how he was never satisfied with depicting the surface of things, how he wanted to reach the core… All that appeals to me. Although sometimes my work is very different in the mood or technique, I strive for his intensity.
q) Describe a typical day of art making for you.
A I wake up at 7am, walk my dogs and feed them. Then, I go to my studio where I paint until noon. I eat. I go back to the studio until 5pm when my working day is over. 7 days a week, 365 days a year or almost. As simple as that.
q) Do you have goals, specific things you want to achieve with your art or in your career as an artist?
a) I want to upstage Picasso. The problem is that I’m Canadian and that Canadians don’t support their artists as larger countries do. The art market is just not big enough here.
q) What contemporary artists or developments in art interest you?
a) I’m interested in seeing more contemporary painters in museums. I’m really bored with all those postmodern installations and videos. I think it’s time we see painting as a relevant medium to express contemporary issues and not just a relic of the past.
q) How long does it typically take you to finish a piece?
a) In average, I spend 3-5 days on a piece.
q) Do you enjoy selling your pieces, or are you emotionally attached to them?
a) I’m not attached to most of them. Some of them I particularly love but then I know I’ll make other good ones. Selling a piece just encourages me to make more. It also makes space for others to come.
q) Is music important to you? If so, what are some things you're listening to now?
a) Music is very important in the studio. It sets the mood. Right now I’m listening to the French singer Barbara. Very tragic and sensitive.
q) Books?
a) Books are very important too. My all-time favorite books are Rimbaud’s Illuminations and Nietzsche’s Thus Spoke Zarathustra. Right now, I’m reading a biography of Francis Bacon.
q) What theories or beliefs do you have regarding creativity or the creative process?
a) I believe art is deeply spiritual. More than religion, which is essentially political.
q) What do you do (or what do you enjoy doing) when you're not creating?
a) Having sex. And playing with my dogs.
q) Do you have any projects or shows coming up that you are particularly excited about?
a) I’ll have a solo show called “Balls to the Wall” at the Patrick John Mills Gallery in Ottawa in November 2012.
q) Do you follow contemporary art scenes? If so, how? What websites, magazines, galleries do you prefer?
a) I don’t really “follow” it. I just get a glimpse of it here and there and that’s enough.
q) Ask yourself a question you'd like to answer, and answer it: What are you working on right now?
a) I’m working on a series of portraits of old masters (such as Rembrandt, Goya, Velasquez) using only pigments those painters were using in their time. I had to do a lot of research first to find what pigments the old masters I had in mind were using and then to get the costly and rare Vermilion, Lapis Lazuli, Orpiment, Malachite and other precious tubes. Most of these colors are mainly used by restorers nowadays and only sold in very small quantities.
q) Any advice for aspiring artists?
a) Be patient. Follow your desire without making compromise.
q) Where can we see more of your work online?
a) On my website: http://www.mathieulaca.com/

Old Masters Video [Mathieu Laca]

Van Gogh (after Vincent)

Mathieu Laca, Vincent Van Gogh II, oil on linen / huile sur toile, oak shadow box with carved onlay gilded with gold leaf / encadrement à gorge en chêne avec applique sculptée dorée à la feuille, 86cmX72cm, 2012



For this portrait of Van Gogh, I used in the highlights one of Vincent's favorite color (if not his favorite), the one he used to paint his famous sunflowers with: Chrome Yellow. It's a very beautiful lemon yellow, bright and powerful when mixed. I've put it in contrast with an orangey yellow ocher and vermilion, all of which are against a cobalt turquoise background.

I spent a lot of time painting his skull over and over again. In my portraits, the top of the head often represent the inner turmoil of the subject. In this case, the turmoil was so intense that it almost abstracted all of Vincent's forehead. But I was pleased with the result: a subtly irradiating head, as if Vincent's mind had just been embodied, right before he left to paint at his last location.

Detail of the frame:







Here's another portrait of Van Gogh I did a few months ago:



Mathieu Laca, Vincent Van Gogh I, huile sur lin/oil on linen, 77cmX62cm, 2011




Vincent Van Gogh, Tournesols dans un vase, 1888

Titian on the Loose

Mathieu Laca, Tiziano Vecellio (a.k.a. Titian), oil and traditional pigments on linen /huile et pigments traditionnels sur lin, 77cm X 62cm, 2012


Titian lived to be 86 years old. His artistic inheritance was enormous. He was the head figure of the Venetian School, known for its legendary use of color (as opposed to the Florentine School [Michelangelo] for which drawing was pre-eminent) and the Netherlandish technique of oil painting. What I find most interesting about Titian is not that role in art history but rather this particular phenomenon we encounter with painters who live quite old (we see it with Goya too). Their style changes radically. Their colors are darker and they become wonderfully sketchy. Their brushwork becomes so alive! They don’t bother polishing anymore. They have nothing to prove. No one to please. That’s what happened to Titian at the end of his life. He painted as if he was on fire! His Flaying of Marsyas is one the greatest examples of that late ecstatic freedom.

Le Titien a vécu 86 ans. Son héritage artistique a été considérable. Il était la figure de proue de l’École de Venise, reconnue pour son utilisation légendaire de la couleur (par opposition à l’École de Florence [Michel-Ange] pour laquelle le dessin avait la prééminence) et la technique de la peinture à l’huile importée alors de Flandres. Pourtant, ce qui m’intéresse chez lui n’est pas tant son rôle dans l’Histoire de l’art que ce phénomène particulier qu’on retrouve chez les très vieux peintres (on le remarque chez Goya aussi). Leur style change radicalement. Leurs couleurs deviennent plus foncées et ils deviennent merveilleusement désinvoltes. Leur touche devient si vivante! Ils ne s’embarrassent plus avec des détails. Ils n’ont plus rien à prouver et ont perdu le soucis de plaire. Leur gestuelle éclate littéralement. C’est ce qui est arrivé au Titien à la fin de sa vie. Il peignait comme s’il était en feu. Son Supplice de Marsyas est un des plus beaux exemples de cette liberté extatique consommée sur le tard.


***


My portrait was painted using only pigments that were available to Titian in his time. Below is how a few of those pigments are distributed in my work. Click here to read more on my research about traditional pigments.

Mon portrait a été peint en utilisant seulement des pigments qui étaient disponibles pour Le Titien à son époque. Ci-dessous, vous trouverez la répartition de quelques-uns de ces pigments. Cliquez ici pour plus de détails sur ma recherche à propos des pigments traditionnels (texte en anglais).

 
***

Below is a detail of the frame. Just as the painting, the framing also refers to tradition. It quotes traditional woodcarving patterns with a copper leaf onlay at the bottom left corner of the otherwise very modern oak shadow box.

Ci-dessous, un détail du cadre. Comme la peinture, l'encadrement fait écho à la tradition. Il cite des motifs traditionnels de la sculpture décorative par l'ajout d'une applique dorée à la feuille de cuivre dans le coin inférieur gauche du pourtant très moderne encadrement à gorge en chêne.
 
 





Titian, The Flaying of Marsyas / Le Supplice de Marsyas, 1575

Sexy Ingres

Mathieu Laca, Jean-Auguste-Dominique Ingres, oil and traditional pigments on linen /
huile et pigments traditionnels sur lin, encadrement à gorge en chêne avec appliques sculptées dorées
à la feuille bigarrée /
oak shadow box with carved onlays gilded with red variegated gold leaf, 83cm X 71cm, 2012


One of the things I learned about Ingres’ technique is that he painted on an intense red ground. Using to a maximum the natural transparency of oil paint, this had the effect of giving incredible life to his figures. By seeing red piercing through the fine subsequent layers of flesh, it’s as if we could see blood pumping through the skin. Life beating from under the paint. My portrait gives tribute to that technical device he used. That intense bright red erupts on the right side of the portrait in a lyrical abstraction that echoes the painter’s sensuous gaze.


Une des choses que j’ai apprises sur la technique d’Ingres est qu’il peignait sur un fond d’un rouge très intense. Utilisant au maximum la transparence naturelle de la peinture à l’huile, cela avait pour effet de donner une incroyable vie à ses personnages. Voyant le rouge poindre
à travers les fines couches d’huile subséquentes composant la chair, c’est comme si on voyait le sang sourdre sous la peau. La vie palpite sous la peinture. Mon portrait rend hommage à cette technique qu’il utilisait. Un rouge vif fait irruption à la droite du portrait dans une abstraction lyrique qui fait écho au regard sensuel du peintre.


***


Below is a detail of the frame. Just as the painting, the framing also refers to tradition. It quotes traditional woodcarving patterns with red variegated gold leaf onlays on the right side of the otherwise very modern oak shadow box.

Ci-dessous, un détail du cadre. Comme la peinture, l'encadrement fait écho à la tradition. Il cite des motifs traditionnels de la sculpture décorative par l'ajout d'appliques dorées à la feuille bigarrée sur le côté droit du pourtant très moderne encadrement à gorge en chêne.





***


My portrait was painted using only pigments that were available to Ingres in his time. Below is how a few of those pigments are distributed in my work. Click here to read more on my research about traditional pigments.

Mon portrait a été peint en utilisant seulement des pigments qui étaient disponibles pour Ingres à son époque. Ci-dessous, vous trouverez la répartition de quelques-uns de ces pigments. Cliquez ici pour plus de détails sur ma recherche à propos des pigments traditionnels (texte en anglais).


Courbet censored on Facebook

Mathieu Laca, Gustave Courbet, huile et pigments traditionnels sur lin /
oil and traditional pigments on linen, 77cm X 62cm, 2012



I think Courbet was the first artist to fully understand the importance of self-promotion. Since he did not have the support of the conventional Académie and the Salon, he had to take the matters into his own hands and invent new means of publicity for his work. He was very politically engaged and maintained a good relationship with left-wing journalists and art critics that often published articles on his work. He was very aware that scandals were the best way to make himself known so he constantly hammered the Salon with large provocative pieces. He even submitted works he knew would be refused in order to broadcast that refusal and comfort his modern hero attitude. He became such a star that we find caricatures of him in the popular press. No doubt that this guy, has he been living today, would have used Facebook like crazy. I'm sure he would have jumped with excitement seeing his work The Origin of the World beeing censored as it quite noisily has been recently by this very puritanical social media.



Je crois que Courbet a été le premier artiste à saisir toute l’importance de l’auto-promotion. Puisqu’il n’avait pas l’appui des institutions traditionnelles qu’étaient l’Académie et le Salon, il a dû prendre en charge sa promotion et inventer de nouveaux moyens de la faire. Il était très engagé politiquement et a entretenu d’excellentes relations avec des journalistes et des critiques d’art de gauche qui publiaient régulièrement des articles sur son travail. Il était très conscient de la valeur immense du scandale pour se faire connaître et a ainsi assommé le Salon de grandes toiles provocantes à tous les ans. Il a même soumis des œuvres en sachant qu’elles seraient refusées pour enfin diffuser ce refus et conforter son attitude de héros moderne. Il est devenu une telle vedette qu’on retrouvait des caricatures le représentant dans la presse populaire. Aucun doute que, s’il eût vécu aujourd’hui, il aurait fait un usage effréné de Facebook. Je suis certain qu'il aurait sauté de joie de voir son Origine du monde censurée dans les émois comme ça a été le cas récemment par ce très puritain réseau social.


***

My portrait was painted using only pigments that were available to Courbet in his time. Below is how a few of those pigments are distributed in my work. Click here to read more on my research about traditional pigments.

Mon portrait a été peint en utilisant seulement des pigments qui étaient disponibles pour Courbet à son époque. Ci-dessous, vous trouverez la répartition de quelques-uns de ces pigments. Cliquez ici pour plus de détails sur ma recherche à propos des pigments traditionnels (texte en anglais).





Gustave Courbet, The Origin of the World / L'Origine du monde, 1866





Gustave Courbet, The Burial at Ornans / L'enterrement à Ornans, 1849

About Flowers and Butts

A wise man once said: “He who can paint nice flowers with the matching pot, can paint an ugly face with the matching butt”. It’s generally the case of every great saying; we never know exactly what it means, so we try to imagine.
 
What wouldn’t we do to be loved? I, for one, tired or not, wake up every morning at seven to take the dogs out. Why? Of course, it’s partly because I don’t want to get poop all over the place, but mainly because I want my dogs to love me. When the mailman brings, day after day, my neighbor’s bills in my mailbox, do I flush the stack? No! I put on a nice big smile on my face, knock at my neighbor’s door and kindly give him the crap. Why? Love! And, the other day, when that stupid young brat on roller blades yelled at me to shove off because he wasn’t able to stop and I was in his way, I could have stretched a leg sending the kid flying in the bush. No! I gently pushed away repressing my will to kill, or, at least, to hurt him like hell. Why? Love! We, humans, are like that. We’ll do anything to be loved; that’s what makes mankind so lovable and so many human beings a pain in the ass.
 
However, we must be careful not to over-do it. What about your dentist? Does he have any choice? He must pull that aching tooth out, love or not. And what about the policeman, when you miss a stop sign? Can he be lovable? And your doctor, and the mailman with your stack of bills, and the teacher when your kid just broke the dean’s office window with a golf ball (What the hell was he doing with a golf ball at school?), and the guy writing to you about that income tax you “forgot” to pay. What about those who can’t be lovable just because it’s their job to be obnoxious? Somebody has to do the dirty jobs!

What about the artists? Almost all of them are normal human beings (Here, I could put a few names but I want so much to be lovable!). This morning, I saw on Facebook photos of an opening at a nearby gallery. The guy wanted so much to be loved; or, maybe he needed desperately to eat. Frankly, it was sickening! Huge portraits of Marilyn Monroe (Yes! Some artists are that desperate!); huge portraits of Einstein (Albert; not Franck); huge portraits of Elizabeth Taylor before she started to droop; huge portraits of what I presume to be a local female singer with surgically enhanced and probably sexy lips. I am sure the guy must sell. Just the kind of paintings people buy to decorate a living room and try to sell at a garage sale when they change decoration.

This is what I find profoundly fair about art. It is not that hard to sell like a whore. Whores can be lovable. As a matter of fact, isn’t it what they sell, love, or some kind of love? At least they try their best to be lovable even if they think the client looks like a stinking beast.

Everybody has a role to play in society. The preacher preaches, the teacher teaches, the manager manages and the secretary secretes. But, what about the visual artist? They, too, have a role to play in society. But their role is certainly not to please at any price or to produce pieces that would inevitably find some jerk to buy it just because “it looks so much like art”!
What exactly is the role of the visual artist? It is not for me to answer. I wouldn’t even try to answer such a question (Remember, I want so much to be lovable). 

All I know is that there is an unrelenting justice in Art. If an artist doesn’t fairly play the role he was born to play, sooner or later, he ends up in a garage sale.

Comeau

The Happy Beaver, the Jolly Lovers and a Barrel of Powder

Mathieu Laca, Ride, 2009

How I would like to show you one of Mathieu’s (Laca) latest paintings. To be exact, he finished it a couple of months ago; long before it was really finished, I fell in love with it and decided to frame it. For me, it was such a precious piece that I took more than five months to build the frame. But, sadly, I can’t show it right now on the blog because it is part of the next show, I Killed the Group of Seven. Sometimes, it’s really cruel to have to play by the rules; rules are rules, and I intend to respect every one of them; but nobody said I couldn’t talk about it so, here it is!

First, I must say that I was never a great fan of Canadian History. Even if I know that those things are important, I always thought that the past was boring. “We must learn History if we don’t want to make the same mistakes again and again”. Crap! We constantly make the same mistakes anyway. “We must know where we come from to know where we’re going to”. Crap! Look at politics, look at the economy, look at the environment, look at the way Religions are behaving, look at hate growing like weed everywhere; I’ll tell you where we’re heading: head first in a brick wall! I don’t need to read any big book to know that! And, let’s be honest: the way History is taught is not always credible: read a chapter of Canadian History in a French book and read the same chapter in an English book and you feel like you’re reading two different collections of lies.
When I first saw Mathieu’s painting called Ottawa, I understood so many things. In that single painting you can see our past, all of King Harper’s reign, and where all this mess is taking us. You almost can feel the huge blast that will probably put an end to all the stupidities we can see daily in the newscast. The wick can’t burn forever! The scene is tragic, it’s funny, it’s sad, it’s gross, it’s inevitable, it’s unbelievable, it’s obscene, it’s the cruel reality and, most of all, it’s totally stupid, just like politics, past, present and future, just like our PM licking Queen Elizabeth’s ass hoping she’ll hit him with her magic wand to make him look more and more like the gruesome sticky stinking frog he is in reality. All that in a single painting!
Sometimes I worry. What’s going on inside Mathieu’s head? I live with him; we spend all our time together; we work together, we eat together, we relax together, we sleep together. I should know what’s going on inside his head! But, frankly, I don’t have a single clue. Sometimes, he reminds me of Hieronymus Bosch: those guys with flutes up their ass, these couples making love inside huge glass bubbles, those figures with human bodies and bird heads eating people, those self propelled knives cutting ears and balls… Isn’t it just like the real world? When you see those politicians on TV trying to convince people that Art and Culture is not important and even dangerous, don’t they remind you of that guy with a flute up his ass?
That’s what I love about great artists: we can’t imagine what’s going on inside their head. I don’t believe I would be able to live my everyday life without those visions they so generously give us.
At the same time, it makes me sad to realize that being an artist must be a terrible solitude. I always do my best to share Mathieu’s world but I know it’s useless. Great artists are modern hermits: they live in a world we can’t understand but they generously give us ways of living in ours without becoming too crazy.

You must see this painting: it’s Ottawa as you never saw it!
Comeau

The Bogeyman

Mathieu Laca, Bluebeard, 2006

One of the worst stories I ever heard in my life was the one of Matthew Shepard.
“Matthew Wayne Shepard (December 1, 1976 – October 12, 1998) was a student at the University of Wyoming who was tortured and murdered near Laramie Wyoming, in October 1998. He was attacked on the night of October 6–7, and died at Poudre Valley Hospital in Fort Collins, Colorado, on October 12 from severe head injuries” (Wikipedia). He was tortured and murdered because of his sexual orientation. Nobody can imagine how this story could get worst than it already was; but human nature is a bottomless pit of hate and anger. During Matthew’s funerals, Reverend Fred Phelps of the Wesboro Baptist Church of Topeka, Kansas and his flock demonstrated carrying signs showing hateful slogans.
The whole story is beautifully retold in the Moisés Kaulman’s play (link) and film (link).
This story came back to my mind this morning when I received an email denouncing ways groups that specialize in spreading hate all over the world use to fund themselves. Many of these groups are well known: Abiding Truth Ministries, New Generation Ministries, Noua Drepata, Truth in Action Ministries, Dove World Outreach Ministries, Julio Severo's Last Days Watchman Site, Faithful Word Baptist Church, Family Research Institute, Americans for Truth About Homosexuality, American Society for the Defense of Tradition Family and Property. Those are only ten among the worst, but the list could be frighteningly long.
Hate, hostility, anger, righteous indignation is, for so many persons, a way of life. For these individuals or these groups, hate, hostility, anger, righteous indignation is spelled: P-O-W-E-R. Power over gays, power over races, power over women, power over needy, power over elders, etc. is their daily bread.
This is what I call the Bogeyman Syndrome. Mom said: “If you don’t stop sucking your thumb, the Bogeyman will get you!” She looked so powerful! We were so afraid!
Sadly, the Bogeyman is still all over the world. Wherever somebody is looking for power, the Bogeyman is never very far.
I wish I could show you Mathieu’s (Laca) painting called The Bogeyman that will be featured in the upcoming “I killed the Group of Seven” exhibition. In just a blink, we see, we feel, we understand all of the Bogeyman Syndrome. It’s powerful, it’s frightening, a true picture of hatred when it takes root in the heart of man. But, remember what I said in my last post on this blog (link): I am totally respectful of rules!
That’s not completely true. To be frank, I, too, am scared of the Bogeyman!
Comeau